Triple
T19353658
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Draft Conclusions on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties |
E484083
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | interpretative guidelines |
C989
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: interpretative guidelines Context triple: [Draft Conclusions on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties, instanceOf, interpretative guidelines]
-
A.
normative guideline
chosen
A normative guideline is a prescriptive rule or principle that defines how things ought to be done or how people ought to behave within a particular context or system.
-
B.
interpretative decision
An interpretative decision is a choice made by applying judgment to understand, explain, or assign meaning to ambiguous information, texts, or situations.
-
C.
accounting standard interpretation
An accounting standard interpretation is an authoritative explanation or clarification that guides how specific accounting standards should be applied in practice to ensure consistent and accurate financial reporting.
-
D.
ICH guideline
An ICH guideline is an internationally harmonized technical standard developed by the International Council for Harmonisation to ensure the quality, safety, and efficacy of pharmaceuticals across different regulatory regions.
-
E.
philosophical interpretation
A philosophical interpretation is a conceptual framework that explains, clarifies, or recontextualizes ideas, texts, or phenomena in terms of underlying philosophical assumptions, theories, and arguments.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d244f8819080eb1f3491300db2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:34 p.m.