Triple
T19352578
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | WPS |
E484057
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityRecommendationFromExperts |
P11328
|
FINISHED |
| Object | avoid using WPS PIN method |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: avoid using WPS PIN method | Statement: [WPS, securityRecommendationFromExperts, avoid using WPS PIN method]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityRecommendationFromExperts Context triple: [WPS, securityRecommendationFromExperts, avoid using WPS PIN method]
-
A.
securityRecommendation
chosen
Indicates that one entity advises or prescribes specific security-related actions, settings, or measures for another entity.
-
B.
securityAdvisory
Indicates a relationship where an entity issues, references, or is associated with a warning or guidance about security vulnerabilities, risks, or protective measures.
-
C.
securityAttention
Indicates that an entity is the focus of monitoring, concern, or scrutiny from a security perspective.
-
D.
protectionMeasures
Indicates actions or safeguards implemented to prevent harm, damage, or risk to someone or something.
-
E.
securityGuarantee
Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d244f8819080eb1f3491300db2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e61905b16881909ab0e932bb9a0cda |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd13a8cc81909cd02668564c9f29 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:34 p.m.