Triple
T19352458
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PBKDF2 |
E484055
|
entity |
| Predicate | canUseHashFunction |
P9928
|
FINISHED |
| Object | SHA-1 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SHA-1 | Statement: [PBKDF2, canUseHashFunction, SHA-1]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canUseHashFunction Context triple: [PBKDF2, canUseHashFunction, SHA-1]
-
A.
hashFunction
Indicates a relationship where an input value is transformed into a fixed-size output (hash) according to a specific deterministic hashing algorithm.
-
B.
hasKeyFunction
Indicates that one entity serves as a primary or essential function or role for another entity.
-
C.
hasCryptUse
Indicates that an entity makes use of cryptographic methods, protocols, or mechanisms in its operation or behavior.
-
D.
requiresHashableElements
Indicates that the relationship or operation can only be applied when all involved elements support hashing (i.e., can be used as keys in hash-based structures).
-
E.
canUse
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the ability, permission, or suitability to make use of another entity or resource.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d244f8819080eb1f3491300db2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e61905b16881909ab0e932bb9a0cda |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd13a8cc81909cd02668564c9f29 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:34 p.m.