Triple
T19351887
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TLS 1.2 |
E484041
|
entity |
| Predicate | follows |
P134
|
FINISHED |
| Object | TLS 1.1 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: TLS 1.1 | Statement: [TLS 1.2, follows, TLS 1.1]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: TLS 1.1 Context triple: [TLS 1.2, follows, TLS 1.1]
-
A.
TLS 1.1
chosen
TLS 1.1 is an older version of the Transport Layer Security protocol that improved upon earlier SSL standards but has since been deprecated in favor of more secure versions like TLS 1.2 and 1.3.
-
B.
TLS 1.0
TLS 1.0 is an early version of the Transport Layer Security protocol used to secure communications over computer networks, now largely deprecated in favor of more secure later versions.
-
C.
TLS 1.2
TLS 1.2 is a widely deployed version of the Transport Layer Security protocol that provides encrypted and authenticated communication over computer networks.
-
D.
SSL 3.0
SSL 3.0 is an obsolete cryptographic protocol that once secured internet communications and served as the foundation for the early versions of TLS.
-
E.
SSL 2.0
SSL 2.0 is an early, now-obsolete version of the Secure Sockets Layer protocol that provided encrypted communication over networks before being replaced by more secure successors like TLS.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d244f8819080eb1f3491300db2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e61904a878819084d58ed3b7d8a978 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:34 p.m.