Triple
T19347624
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Costa Pinheiro |
E483923
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCreativeConcept |
P111071
|
FINISHED |
| Object | symbolic representation of space |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: symbolic representation of space | Statement: [Costa Pinheiro, hasCreativeConcept, symbolic representation of space]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCreativeConcept Context triple: [Costa Pinheiro, hasCreativeConcept, symbolic representation of space]
-
A.
hasCreativeApproach
Indicates that an entity employs an original, imaginative, or unconventional method or strategy in performing an action or solving a problem.
-
B.
hasCreativeScope
Indicates that one entity possesses authority or responsibility to make creative decisions or contributions within a defined domain or project.
-
C.
hasIdea
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses, holds, or originates a particular idea.
-
D.
hasBrightIdea
Indicates that an entity conceives or possesses a clever, insightful, or innovative idea.
-
E.
hasAuthorIdea
Indicates that an author is associated with or responsible for originating a particular idea.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d244f8819080eb1f3491300db2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6185c95248190b1e5bb8626489767 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd12303c8190a2027c062b2dff40 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:34 p.m.