Triple
T19335319
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vogelsbergkreis |
E483606
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsTown |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lauterbach |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lauterbach | Statement: [Vogelsbergkreis, containsTown, Lauterbach]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lauterbach Context triple: [Vogelsbergkreis, containsTown, Lauterbach]
-
A.
Lauterbach
chosen
Lauterbach is a small town in the German state of Hesse known for its historic old town and traditional half-timbered architecture.
-
B.
Schwartau
Schwartau is a river in northern Germany that flows through the state of Schleswig-Holstein before joining the Trave.
-
C.
Fahrenkopf
Fahrenkopf is a surname most prominently associated with Frank J. Fahrenkopf Jr., an American lawyer, lobbyist, and former chairman of the Republican National Committee.
-
D.
Sibbach
Sibbach was the individual litigant who challenged the scope of federal procedural rules in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.
-
E.
Lippinghausen
Lippinghausen is a locality within the municipality of Hiddenhausen in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d13e3c81909d91d1d5ec37c095 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e61644b80c819080f9bca086424a36 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:33 p.m.