Triple

T19333226
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lak E483549 entity
Predicate usesLanguageInReligion P69775 FINISHED
Object Arabic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arabic | Statement: [Lak, usesLanguageInReligion, Arabic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesLanguageInReligion
Context triple: [Lak, usesLanguageInReligion, Arabic]
  • A. usedForReligiousLanguage
    Indicates that something is employed specifically in the context of religious language, such as for expressing, communicating, or performing religious beliefs, practices, or rituals.
  • B. positionOnReligiousLanguage
    Indicates a stance or viewpoint someone holds regarding how religious language should be understood, interpreted, or used.
  • C. isUsedByReligion
    Indicates that something (such as an object, practice, text, or symbol) is employed or utilized within the context of a particular religion.
  • D. languageOfReligiousLife chosen
    Indicates the language primarily used in the religious practices, rituals, or spiritual life associated with an entity.
  • E. hasLanguageOfScripture
    Indicates that an entity’s scriptural or sacred texts are written or expressed in a specified language.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d13e3c81909d91d1d5ec37c095 completed April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e61642f49c81909226cfd701f7c139 completed April 20, 2026, 12:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4dd12303c8190a2027c062b2dff40 completed April 19, 2026, 1:48 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:33 p.m.