Triple
T19328058
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gertrud Hensel |
E483410
|
entity |
| Predicate | spouse |
P13
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kurt Hensel |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kurt Hensel | Statement: [Gertrud Hensel, spouse, Kurt Hensel]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kurt Hensel Context triple: [Gertrud Hensel, spouse, Kurt Hensel]
-
A.
Kurt Hensel
chosen
Kurt Hensel was a German mathematician best known for introducing p-adic numbers, which became fundamental in number theory and algebraic geometry.
-
B.
Otto Kummer
Otto Kummer is a notable individual who shares the surname associated with the Kummer family name.
-
C.
Friedrich Kummer
Friedrich Kummer was a 19th-century German cellist and composer known for his influential pedagogical works and contributions to cello repertoire.
-
D.
Ernst Eduard Kummer
Ernst Eduard Kummer was a 19th-century German mathematician renowned for his foundational work in number theory, particularly on ideal numbers and Fermat's Last Theorem.
-
E.
Ferdinand von Lindemann
Ferdinand von Lindemann was a German mathematician best known for proving the transcendence of π, thereby establishing the impossibility of squaring the circle with ruler and compass.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d13e3c81909d91d1d5ec37c095 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6163f32f48190be17cccf4e537372 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:33 p.m.