Triple
T19327875
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | p-adic numbers |
E483405
|
entity |
| Predicate | valuationRing |
P66253
|
FINISHED |
| Object | p-adic integers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: p-adic integers | Statement: [p-adic numbers, valuationRing, p-adic integers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: valuationRing Context triple: [p-adic numbers, valuationRing, p-adic integers]
-
A.
valuationStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of an entity’s assessed value within a valuation process (e.g., pending, active, finalized, or invalid).
-
B.
valuationDescription
Indicates that a textual explanation or narrative is provided describing how an entity has been valued or appraised.
-
C.
valuedBy
Indicates that one entity is regarded as important, useful, or held in high esteem by another entity.
-
D.
valorization
Indicates the process of increasing or assigning value, importance, or worth to something, often through social, economic, or cultural recognition.
-
E.
ringType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of ring associated with an entity or relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d13e3c81909d91d1d5ec37c095 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6163f32f48190be17cccf4e537372 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd0ef66881909d489d634eee817a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:33 p.m.