Triple
T19326954
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Yellow X |
E483383
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDominantMotif |
P2366
|
FINISHED |
| Object | X shape |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: X shape | Statement: [The Yellow X, hasDominantMotif, X shape]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDominantMotif Context triple: [The Yellow X, hasDominantMotif, X shape]
-
A.
usesMotifsFrom
Indicates that one entity incorporates or draws upon recurring themes, patterns, or elements that originate from another entity.
-
B.
featuresMotif
Indicates that something contains, incorporates, or prominently includes a particular recurring motif or pattern.
-
C.
primaryMotif
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the main recurring theme or dominant motif associated with another entity.
-
D.
hasClosingMotif
Indicates that one entity features or is associated with a recurring thematic or structural pattern used at the end or conclusion of another entity.
-
E.
hasDominantSpecies
Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by a species that is predominant or most influential within it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d13e3c81909d91d1d5ec37c095 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6163e3a5081909195192356bcebc3 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd0ef66881909d489d634eee817a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:33 p.m.