Triple
T19317396
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aztec nobility |
E483133
|
entity |
| Predicate | partiallyIntegratedInto |
P64654
|
FINISHED |
| Object | colonial New Spanish nobility |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: colonial New Spanish nobility | Statement: [Aztec nobility, partiallyIntegratedInto, colonial New Spanish nobility]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partiallyIntegratedInto Context triple: [Aztec nobility, partiallyIntegratedInto, colonial New Spanish nobility]
-
A.
partiallyIncorporatedInto
chosen
Indicates that one entity has been integrated or absorbed into another entity, but only to a limited or incomplete extent.
-
B.
previouslyIntegratedInto
Indicates that an entity was formerly incorporated or included as part of another entity or system in the past.
-
C.
reintegratedInto
Indicates that an entity has been brought back and incorporated again into a group, system, or context it was previously separated from.
-
D.
adoptedAsPartOf
Indicates that one entity has been taken in, integrated, or accepted as a component or member within another entity or larger whole.
-
E.
partiallySupportedBy
Indicates that something receives incomplete, limited, or not fully sufficient support from another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d04d5c8190baa816986f2b1d1e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e60d85046c81909d972a6b369b0c2b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 11:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd0ef66881909d489d634eee817a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:32 p.m.