Triple
T19312909
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Park an der Ilm |
E483015
|
entity |
| Predicate | GoetheInvolvedIn |
P135546
|
FINISHED |
| Object | design and planning |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: design and planning | Statement: [Park an der Ilm, GoetheInvolvedIn, design and planning]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: GoetheInvolvedIn Context triple: [Park an der Ilm, GoetheInvolvedIn, design and planning]
-
A.
relationshipToGustav von Aschenbach
Indicates the specific type of personal, social, or emotional connection an entity has to Gustav von Aschenbach.
-
B.
coAuthorOfLibrettoWith
Indicates that two or more individuals collaborated in writing the same libretto.
-
C.
authorOfWorkAbout
Indicates that one entity is the author or creator of a work whose subject or content is about another entity.
-
D.
hasHistoricalWritingInfluenceFrom
Indicates that one entity’s historical writing style, content, or traditions are influenced by those of another entity.
-
E.
librettistNationality
Indicates the relationship between a librettist and the country or nationality with which they are associated.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d04d5c8190baa816986f2b1d1e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e604cf25c081908a30814b15d78c25 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd0ef66881909d489d634eee817a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e4e4709d4481908c280cdd2ac18977 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:32 p.m.