Triple
T19308792
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache |
E482910
|
entity |
| Predicate | influenced |
P9
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Structure of Scientific Revolutions |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions | Statement: [Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache, influenced, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Context triple: [Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache, influenced, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]
-
A.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
chosen
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is a landmark 1962 book by philosopher Thomas S. Kuhn that introduced the concept of paradigm shifts to explain how scientific fields undergo periodic, transformative changes rather than progressing through a steady accumulation of knowledge.
-
B.
The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions
The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions is a philosophical essay by Karl Popper in which he defends the rational character of scientific progress against relativistic and historicist interpretations of theory change.
-
C.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
The Logic of Scientific Discovery is Karl Popper’s foundational philosophical work that introduces falsifiability as the key criterion distinguishing scientific theories from non-scientific ones.
-
D.
The Structure of Science
The Structure of Science is a seminal 1961 work of philosophy of science by Ernest Nagel that systematically analyzes the logical structure and methodology of scientific explanation across different disciplines.
-
E.
Conjectures and Refutations
Conjectures and Refutations is a major philosophical work by Karl Popper that develops his theory of scientific knowledge through the ideas of falsifiability, critical testing, and the growth of knowledge via bold hypotheses and their refutation.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d04d5c8190baa816986f2b1d1e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e604cb47c88190bd01e6f5f4d2204f |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:32 p.m.