Triple
T19280330
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nandigrama |
E482169
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedTextTradition |
P133609
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Itihasa-Purana tradition |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Itihasa-Purana tradition | Statement: [Nandigrama, associatedTextTradition, Itihasa-Purana tradition]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedTextTradition Context triple: [Nandigrama, associatedTextTradition, Itihasa-Purana tradition]
-
A.
textBelongsToTradition
chosen
Indicates that a given text is associated with, derived from, or recognized as part of a particular intellectual, cultural, or religious tradition.
-
B.
mainTradition
Indicates that one entity represents the primary or dominant tradition associated with another entity.
-
C.
linkedToTradition
Indicates a relationship where something is connected or related to a particular tradition, heritage, or customary practice.
-
D.
cognateTradition
Indicates that two entities belong to the same or closely related cultural, intellectual, or historical tradition, sharing a common origin or lineage.
-
E.
commentarialTraditionBy
Indicates that a given work, idea, or text belongs to or is interpreted within a particular commentarial tradition established or represented by the referenced agent or school.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8cf61b0819096fe3e4107827c4e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5fbfdfaf481909e0434f33053cc62 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd07a7208190afcd51ba1dc87c33 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:30 p.m.