Triple
T19278318
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Southern Wintun |
E482115
|
entity |
| Predicate | traditionalLanguage |
P6149
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Patwin language |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Patwin language | Statement: [Southern Wintun, traditionalLanguage, Patwin language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Patwin language Context triple: [Southern Wintun, traditionalLanguage, Patwin language]
-
A.
Patwin language
chosen
The Patwin language is a nearly extinct Native American language once spoken by the Patwin people of north-central California and classified within the proposed Penutian family.
-
B.
Patamona language
The Patamona language is an indigenous Cariban language spoken by the Patamona people of the Guiana Highlands in Guyana and northern Brazil.
-
C.
Picene language
The Picene language is an extinct Italic language once spoken by the ancient Piceni people in east-central Italy.
-
D.
Pucikwar language
Pucikwar language is an endangered indigenous language of the Pucikwar people of the Andaman Islands in India.
-
E.
Opata language
The Opata language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Opata people of northern Mexico, particularly in the present-day state of Sonora.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8ce54cc8190998418ff1f66ef28 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5fbbe6e9c8190a7fa2ef3aa598e6c |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:11 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:30 p.m.