Triple

T19277219
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nabo E482087 entity
Predicate nameBearerLanguageCommunity P5562 FINISHED
Object Arabic-speaking communities LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arabic-speaking communities | Statement: [Nabo, nameBearerLanguageCommunity, Arabic-speaking communities]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: nameBearerLanguageCommunity
Context triple: [Nabo, nameBearerLanguageCommunity, Arabic-speaking communities]
  • A. languageOfNamesake
    Indicates the language in which the namesake of an entity (such as a person, place, or object) is named or expressed.
  • B. ethnonymInLanguage
    Indicates that a given term is the name used in a specified language to refer to the people of a particular ethnic group or nationality.
  • C. ethnonymLanguageFamily
    Indicates a relationship where an ethnonym is associated with the language family traditionally spoken or linked to that ethnic group.
  • D. hasLanguageOfToponym
    Indicates that a place name (toponym) is expressed in or associated with a particular language.
  • E. hasLanguageCommunity chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or serves a particular language community.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8ce54cc8190998418ff1f66ef28 completed April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5fbbd5f34819086535f28fd880411 completed April 20, 2026, 10:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4dd07a7208190afcd51ba1dc87c33 completed April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:30 p.m.