Triple
T19261540
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Abell 3526 |
E481659
|
entity |
| Predicate | isDynamicallyComplex |
P28756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Abell 3526, isDynamicallyComplex, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isDynamicallyComplex Context triple: [Abell 3526, isDynamicallyComplex, yes]
-
A.
hasComplex
Indicates that one entity possesses, is associated with, or is part of a larger composite structure or complex formed with another entity.
-
B.
isPartOfDynamically
Indicates that one entity is currently a component or member of another entity in a way that can change over time or at runtime.
-
C.
hasComplexity
chosen
Indicates that something possesses a certain level or type of complexity, often in terms of structure, behavior, or difficulty.
-
D.
isTotallyComplex
Indicates that something possesses a level of complexity that is complete, multifaceted, and not reducible to simpler or purely real/straightforward components.
-
E.
hasComplexification
Indicates that one entity is a more complex or elaborated version, form, or development of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8ce54cc8190998418ff1f66ef28 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5fb8a022c8190b313e9d11d38e482 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd002d00819088b625056edfb74e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:28 p.m.