Triple
T19261536
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Abell 3526 |
E481659
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasIntraclusterMedium |
P135128
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hot gas |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hot gas | Statement: [Abell 3526, hasIntraclusterMedium, hot gas]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIntraclusterMedium Context triple: [Abell 3526, hasIntraclusterMedium, hot gas]
-
A.
hasIntraclusterLight
Indicates that a galaxy cluster possesses diffuse light distributed between its member galaxies, rather than confined within individual galaxies.
-
B.
hasCluster
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a specific cluster or grouping of related elements.
-
C.
hasClusterRadius
Indicates the radius or spatial extent associated with a particular cluster.
-
D.
hasPrimaryClusterIn
Indicates that an entity’s main or most significant cluster is located within or associated with a specified cluster or grouping.
-
E.
isRichCluster
Indicates that a given cluster possesses the properties and characteristics of a rich cluster (e.g., high galaxy density and mass).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8ce54cc8190998418ff1f66ef28 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5fb8a022c8190b313e9d11d38e482 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dd002d00819088b625056edfb74e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e4ddcf50108190a09d0f1291c17374 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:51 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:28 p.m.