Triple
T19254826
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bagelkhand |
E481487
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalPrincelyState |
P74995
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ajaigarh State |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ajaigarh State | Statement: [Bagelkhand, historicalPrincelyState, Ajaigarh State]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ajaigarh State Context triple: [Bagelkhand, historicalPrincelyState, Ajaigarh State]
-
A.
Ajaigarh State
chosen
Ajaigarh State was a former princely state in British India, located in what is now central India and ruled by a local dynasty under indirect colonial administration.
-
B.
Narsinghgarh State
Narsinghgarh State was a former princely state in central India, historically ruled by local royalty under British suzerainty.
-
C.
Jhalawar State
Jhalawar State was a princely state in British India, located in the southeastern part of present-day Rajasthan and ruled by Jhala Rajput rulers.
-
D.
Mundhar State
Mundhar State was a small princely hill state located in the Simla Hills region of colonial India.
-
E.
Alirajpur State
Alirajpur State was a former princely state in colonial India, located in what is now Madhya Pradesh and ruled by local Rajput chiefs under British suzerainty.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8cd9d1081908a181d02b88b59b8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5fb3459d08190a7c28ed3f8c82a97 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:28 p.m.