Triple
T192476
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LHCb |
E3749
|
entity |
| Predicate | designLuminosity |
P5343
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lower than ATLAS and CMS |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lower than ATLAS and CMS | Statement: [LHCb, designLuminosity, lower than ATLAS and CMS]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designLuminosity Context triple: [LHCb, designLuminosity, lower than ATLAS and CMS]
-
A.
designUse
Indicates that one entity is used as a design basis, purpose, or intended functional use for another entity.
-
B.
hasLighting
Indicates that one entity is equipped with, contains, or is characterized by a particular type or configuration of lighting.
-
C.
designEnergy
Indicates that an entity is responsible for planning, specifying, or determining the energy-related characteristics or performance of another entity.
-
D.
designedIn
Indicates that something was created, planned, or conceived during a particular time period or at a specific location.
-
E.
designPhilosophy
Indicates the guiding principles, values, or conceptual approach that shape how something is designed or created.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2548debd48190ae3a06d6e65b53c6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:35 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a259669ba08190a5be1d2e10e70b27 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2567567508190b3a41329a15c7156 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a25710bdfc81909b6697159104cf53 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:41 a.m.