Triple
T19231068
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Stone–Weierstrass theorem |
E480871
|
entity |
| Predicate | complexVersionCondition |
P135270
|
FINISHED |
| Object | A separates points of X |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: A separates points of X | Statement: [Stone–Weierstrass theorem, complexVersionCondition, A separates points of X]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: complexVersionCondition Context triple: [Stone–Weierstrass theorem, complexVersionCondition, A separates points of X]
-
A.
compositeVersionDescription
Indicates a descriptive text that explains the content, purpose, or characteristics of a specific composite version.
-
B.
modificationCondition
Indicates the specific circumstances or requirements under which a change or modification to something is permitted, triggered, or becomes applicable.
-
C.
definesVersionOf
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the version or variant identity of another entity.
-
D.
containsExplicitVersion
Indicates that one entity includes or specifies a clearly defined, concrete version of another entity.
-
E.
hasVersionIn
Indicates that one entity exists as a specific version or variant within the context, format, or system represented by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8ccb8f48190ad420098e74fb1db |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5fa9ce5e081909df994841ce476d5 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dcfae6f081909cc173cf71a5005c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e4debc39ac81908b7c5ef797046360 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:55 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:25 p.m.