Triple
T19227334
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Boyle Lectures |
E480769
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfApologetics |
P51650
|
FINISHED |
| Object | natural-theological apologetics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: natural-theological apologetics | Statement: [Boyle Lectures, typeOfApologetics, natural-theological apologetics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfApologetics Context triple: [Boyle Lectures, typeOfApologetics, natural-theological apologetics]
-
A.
typeOfTheology
Indicates the specific theological category, tradition, or system that characterizes a given religious belief, doctrine, or discourse.
-
B.
philosophicalArgumentType
Indicates that one entity is classified as a specific type or category of philosophical argument in relation to another.
-
C.
religiousArgumentType
chosen
Indicates that the relationship involves classifying or characterizing an argument according to its religious nature or type.
-
D.
viewWithinLDSApologetics
Indicates that one entity holds a perspective or interpretation that falls within the scope of Latter-day Saint (LDS) apologetic thought or discourse regarding another entity or topic.
-
E.
theologicalDefenseBy
Indicates a relationship where one entity provides a theological justification, argument, or defense on behalf of another entity, doctrine, or position.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8ccb8f48190ad420098e74fb1db |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5fa9968e88190b14844715ff3aa2a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dcfae6f081909cc173cf71a5005c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:25 p.m.