Triple
T19222621
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Xinomavro |
E480655
|
entity |
| Predicate | wineStructureDescriptor |
P20482
|
FINISHED |
| Object | firm tannins |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: firm tannins | Statement: [Xinomavro, wineStructureDescriptor, firm tannins]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wineStructureDescriptor Context triple: [Xinomavro, wineStructureDescriptor, firm tannins]
-
A.
wineStructure
chosen
Indicates the overall sensory framework of a wine, encompassing how its components like acidity, tannin, body, and alcohol are balanced and interact.
-
B.
wineStyle
Indicates the stylistic category or type of wine (such as its production style, sweetness, body, or other defining characteristics) associated with an entity.
-
C.
wineComponent
Indicates that one entity is a constituent ingredient or part of a wine represented by the other entity.
-
D.
wineStyleContribution
Indicates how much a given factor or component influences or shapes the overall style or character of a wine.
-
E.
wineJarDescription
Indicates that a textual description is provided specifically for a wine jar.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8ccb8f48190ad420098e74fb1db |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5fa94aed081909045cfed8edc6039 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dcfae6f081909cc173cf71a5005c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:24 p.m.