Triple

T19206347
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject John Thornton E480242 entity
Predicate usesWinningsFor P134965 FINISHED
Object funding a search for a lost mine LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: funding a search for a lost mine | Statement: [John Thornton, usesWinningsFor, funding a search for a lost mine]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesWinningsFor
Context triple: [John Thornton, usesWinningsFor, funding a search for a lost mine]
  • A. winnerReceives
    Indicates that the entity identified as the winner is granted or awarded the specified item, benefit, or outcome as a result of winning.
  • B. rewardUse
    Indicates that one entity grants or provides a reward in response to the use or utilization of another entity.
  • C. winnerMake
    Indicates that one entity causes or brings about another entity becoming the winner in a contest, competition, or selection process.
  • D. hasPrizeMoney
    Indicates that an entity awards, offers, or is associated with a specified amount of prize money.
  • E. MagicWins
    Indicates that one entity achieves victory over another through the use of magic or supernatural powers.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8cb8c348190b52075823911c869 completed April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5f99d8ad0819098ebd4ee007149f1 completed April 20, 2026, 10:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4dcf22b3c8190bee02e3af946e114 completed April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e4ddcf50108190a09d0f1291c17374 completed April 19, 2026, 1:51 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:19 p.m.