Triple
T19206135
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1955 United Kingdom general election |
E480237
|
entity |
| Predicate | percentageVoteLiberalParty |
P40761
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2.7% |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2.7% | Statement: [1955 United Kingdom general election, percentageVoteLiberalParty, 2.7%]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: percentageVoteLiberalParty Context triple: [1955 United Kingdom general election, percentageVoteLiberalParty, 2.7%]
-
A.
popularVoteShareLiberals
chosen
Indicates the proportion of the total popular vote that was received by the Liberal party or liberal candidates in an election.
-
B.
LiberalPopularVote
Indicates that the Liberal party received a high or majority share of the popular vote in an election.
-
C.
LiberalDemocratVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes received by the Liberal Democrat party in a given election or electoral unit.
-
D.
rulingPartyPopularVotePercentage
Indicates the percentage of the total popular vote received by the party currently in power or holding the ruling position.
-
E.
NewDemocracyVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes received by the New Democracy party in a given election or electoral context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8cb8c348190b52075823911c869 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5f99d8ad0819098ebd4ee007149f1 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4dcf22b3c8190bee02e3af946e114 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:19 p.m.