Triple
T19174713
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Minnesota state agencies |
E469409
|
entity |
| Predicate | include |
P1393
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Minnesota Department of Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Minnesota Department of Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation | Statement: [Minnesota state agencies, include, Minnesota Department of Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Minnesota Department of Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Context triple: [Minnesota state agencies, include, Minnesota Department of Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation]
-
A.
Iron Range, Minnesota
Iron Range, Minnesota is a historic iron-mining region in northeastern Minnesota known for its rich mineral deposits, mining heritage, and distinctive working-class communities.
-
B.
Minnesota Iron Company
Minnesota Iron Company was a major iron mining and ore production firm in Minnesota that operated as a subsidiary within the larger U.S. steel industry.
-
C.
Iron Range region of Minnesota
The Iron Range region of Minnesota is a historic mining area in northern Minnesota known for its rich iron ore deposits and strong labor and cultural heritage.
-
D.
Hibbing mining district
The Hibbing mining district is a major iron ore mining region on Minnesota’s Mesabi Range, historically one of the world’s most productive sources of iron ore.
-
E.
Eveleth Taconite Company
Eveleth Taconite Company was an iron mining company in Minnesota best known for being the employer at the center of the landmark sexual harassment class-action lawsuit Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Minnesota Department of Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Target entity description: The Minnesota Department of Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation is a state economic development agency focused on supporting business growth, workforce development, and community projects in Minnesota’s Iron Range region, historically tied to iron mining.
-
A.
Iron Range, Minnesota
Iron Range, Minnesota is a historic iron-mining region in northeastern Minnesota known for its rich mineral deposits, mining heritage, and distinctive working-class communities.
-
B.
Minnesota Iron Company
Minnesota Iron Company was a major iron mining and ore production firm in Minnesota that operated as a subsidiary within the larger U.S. steel industry.
-
C.
Iron Range region of Minnesota
The Iron Range region of Minnesota is a historic mining area in northern Minnesota known for its rich iron ore deposits and strong labor and cultural heritage.
-
D.
Hibbing mining district
The Hibbing mining district is a major iron ore mining region on Minnesota’s Mesabi Range, historically one of the world’s most productive sources of iron ore.
-
E.
Eveleth Taconite Company
Eveleth Taconite Company was an iron mining company in Minnesota best known for being the employer at the center of the landmark sexual harassment class-action lawsuit Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd09d5a081909ae43c286651ae5a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5f166d3888190adaf6dc8531a8ed1 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:27 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:06 p.m.