Triple

T19144887
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Government of Río Negro Province E468652 entity
Predicate judicialBody P242 FINISHED
Object Judicial Power of Río Negro — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Judicial Power of Río Negro | Statement: [Government of Río Negro Province, judicialBody, Judicial Power of Río Negro]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Judicial Power of Río Negro
Context triple: [Government of Río Negro Province, judicialBody, Judicial Power of Río Negro]
  • A. Judicial Power of Tierra del Fuego
    The Judicial Power of Tierra del Fuego is the provincial court system responsible for administering justice and interpreting and applying the law within Argentina’s Tierra del Fuego Province.
  • B. Judicial Power of Buenos Aires Province
    The Judicial Power of Buenos Aires Province is the provincial branch of government responsible for administering justice and overseeing the court system within the territory of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina.
  • C. Judicial Power of the State of Hidalgo
    The Judicial Power of the State of Hidalgo is the state-level court system responsible for administering justice and interpreting local and federal laws within the Mexican state of Hidalgo.
  • D. Judicial Power of Peru
    The Judicial Power of Peru is the branch of the Peruvian government responsible for administering justice nationwide through its system of courts and tribunals.
  • E. Judicial Power of the State of Veracruz
    The Judicial Power of the State of Veracruz is the state-level court system in Veracruz, Mexico, responsible for administering justice, interpreting local laws, and resolving legal disputes within the state’s jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Judicial Power of Río Negro
Target entity description: The Judicial Power of Río Negro is the provincial court system responsible for administering justice and interpreting the law within Argentina’s Río Negro Province.
  • A. Judicial Power of Tierra del Fuego
    The Judicial Power of Tierra del Fuego is the provincial court system responsible for administering justice and interpreting and applying the law within Argentina’s Tierra del Fuego Province.
  • B. Judicial Power of Buenos Aires Province
    The Judicial Power of Buenos Aires Province is the provincial branch of government responsible for administering justice and overseeing the court system within the territory of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina.
  • C. Judicial Power of the State of Hidalgo
    The Judicial Power of the State of Hidalgo is the state-level court system responsible for administering justice and interpreting local and federal laws within the Mexican state of Hidalgo.
  • D. Judicial Power of Peru
    The Judicial Power of Peru is the branch of the Peruvian government responsible for administering justice nationwide through its system of courts and tribunals.
  • E. Judicial Power of the State of Veracruz
    The Judicial Power of the State of Veracruz is the state-level court system in Veracruz, Mexico, responsible for administering justice, interpreting local laws, and resolving legal disputes within the state’s jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dd084ff48190ac0f8c46ee722629 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5e978b0b481909a531efa030c5def completed April 20, 2026, 8:53 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:06 p.m.