Triple

T19135980
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ulysses E468434 entity
Predicate legalCase P3996 FINISHED
Object United States v. One Book Called Ulysses — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. One Book Called Ulysses | Statement: [Ulysses, legalCase, United States v. One Book Called Ulysses]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States v. One Book Called Ulysses
Context triple: [Ulysses, legalCase, United States v. One Book Called Ulysses]
  • A. United States v. One Book Called Ulysses chosen
    United States v. One Book Called Ulysses is a landmark 1933 U.S. federal court decision that lifted the ban on James Joyce’s novel "Ulysses" and significantly redefined American obscenity law in favor of literary freedom.
  • B. Printz v. United States
    Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
  • C. United States v. Comstock
    United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
  • D. United States v. Cox
    United States v. Cox is a 1965 U.S. federal appellate court case that addressed the limits of judicial power over prosecutorial discretion, holding that courts cannot compel a U.S. Attorney to sign an indictment.
  • E. Durousseau v. United States
    Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dd0796a48190b34ce4cd9d3f3be5 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5e3ed0704819098be992297320cc9 completed April 20, 2026, 8:29 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:05 p.m.