Triple
T19135729
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Memoirs v. Massachusetts |
E468427
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalTestElement |
P113725
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The dominant theme of the material taken as a whole must appeal to a prurient interest in sex. |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The dominant theme of the material taken as a whole must appeal to a prurient interest in sex. | Statement: [Memoirs v. Massachusetts, legalTestElement, The dominant theme of the material taken as a whole must appeal to a prurient interest in sex.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalTestElement Context triple: [Memoirs v. Massachusetts, legalTestElement, The dominant theme of the material taken as a whole must appeal to a prurient interest in sex.]
-
A.
legalTestType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of legal test or standard that is applied in a given legal context or proceeding.
-
B.
jurisdictionTestElement
Indicates that a specific legal criterion or component is used to determine whether a court or authority has jurisdiction in a given matter.
-
C.
legalExpressionOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the formal legal articulation, representation, or codified form of another entity (such as a right, obligation, or agreement).
-
D.
legalTool
Indicates a relationship where something functions as a legal instrument, mechanism, or means used to achieve or regulate a legal purpose or outcome.
-
E.
legalTarget
Indicates that an action, decision, or rule is directed toward an entity in a manner that is permitted or recognized as valid under the governing legal or rule system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd0796a48190b34ce4cd9d3f3be5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5e3ed0704819098be992297320cc9 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4b9b475d88190a8c15e8eb01dbfef |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:05 p.m.