Triple
T19130289
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edictum Theodorici |
E468296
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalTechnique |
P67232
|
FINISHED |
| Object | compilation of existing norms |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: compilation of existing norms | Statement: [Edictum Theodorici, legalTechnique, compilation of existing norms]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalTechnique Context triple: [Edictum Theodorici, legalTechnique, compilation of existing norms]
-
A.
legalTool
chosen
Indicates a relationship where something functions as a legal instrument, mechanism, or means used to achieve or regulate a legal purpose or outcome.
-
B.
legalPractice
Indicates a relationship where an entity engages in or is associated with the professional provision of legal services or the practice of law.
-
C.
legalConcept
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
-
D.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
E.
legalTermIn
Indicates that a particular legal term or concept is used, defined, or applicable within a specified legal document, jurisdiction, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd0796a48190b34ce4cd9d3f3be5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5e3e8c49481908b6be87af54d12cf |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4b9b085288190b974d649e12e0844 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:05 p.m.