Triple
T19116497
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | People Power Party |
E467919
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasConservativeFaction |
P134490
|
FINISHED |
| Object | traditional conservatives |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: traditional conservatives | Statement: [People Power Party, hasConservativeFaction, traditional conservatives]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConservativeFaction Context triple: [People Power Party, hasConservativeFaction, traditional conservatives]
-
A.
hasConservatism
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a tendency toward conservatism in behavior, beliefs, or practices.
-
B.
hasOpposingFaction
Indicates that one faction stands in opposition or conflict to another faction.
-
C.
hasMoreConservativeRegion
Indicates that one region is characterized by more conservative attributes, policies, or tendencies compared to another region.
-
D.
identifiesAsConservativeLineageTo
Indicates that one entity regards another as belonging to, or continuing, a conservative ideological or traditional lineage.
-
E.
hasMajorFaction
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a primary or dominant faction within a given context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd06a26481908039e2a1bae8c597 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5e3984bf48190818fa2b01b75decb |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4b9b085288190b974d649e12e0844 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:17 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e4bfe8a06081909fd5c28a33e9f218 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:05 p.m.