Triple
T19111862
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PlusCal |
E467808
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsReasoningAbout |
P30846
|
FINISHED |
| Object | safety properties |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: safety properties | Statement: [PlusCal, supportsReasoningAbout, safety properties]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsReasoningAbout Context triple: [PlusCal, supportsReasoningAbout, safety properties]
-
A.
supportReasoningProfile
Indicates that one entity provides justification, evidence, or contextual basis for the reasoning profile or inferential behavior associated with another entity.
-
B.
reasoningType
Indicates the specific kind or mode of reasoning applied in deriving a conclusion or making an inference between entities.
-
C.
hasReasoningComplexity
Indicates that an action, process, or decision involves a certain level or type of cognitive or logical complexity in its reasoning.
-
D.
supportsTheory
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, justification, or endorsement for the validity or acceptance of another entity’s theory.
-
E.
supportsEvaluation
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides the necessary functionality, resources, or conditions for another entity to be assessed, tested, or evaluated.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd06a26481908039e2a1bae8c597 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5e394969c81909d09b2300ea0e041 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4b9ac41848190afd0f33b42cebe99 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:04 p.m.