Triple
T19111684
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Raft consensus algorithm |
E467805
|
entity |
| Predicate | introducedInPaper |
P513
|
FINISHED |
| Object | In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm | Statement: [Raft consensus algorithm, introducedInPaper, In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm Context triple: [Raft consensus algorithm, introducedInPaper, In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm]
-
A.
Paxos consensus algorithm
The Paxos consensus algorithm is a fault-tolerant protocol for achieving agreement among distributed systems, widely used as a foundation for reliable, replicated state machines and modern distributed databases.
-
B.
Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance
Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance is a consensus algorithm for distributed systems that efficiently tolerates Byzantine (arbitrary) faults, enabling reliable operation even when some nodes behave maliciously or unpredictably.
-
C.
Raft consensus algorithm
Raft consensus algorithm is a distributed consensus protocol designed to be more understandable and easier to implement than Paxos while providing equivalent fault-tolerant guarantees.
-
D.
Byzantine fault tolerance
Byzantine fault tolerance is a property of distributed systems that enables them to continue operating correctly even when some components behave arbitrarily or maliciously.
-
E.
Paxos
Paxos is a small Greek island in the Ionian Sea, known for its clear turquoise waters, olive groves, and tranquil, less-touristed atmosphere.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm Target entity description: "In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm" is the research paper that presents and explains the Raft consensus algorithm, emphasizing clarity and ease of understanding in distributed systems.
-
A.
Paxos consensus algorithm
The Paxos consensus algorithm is a fault-tolerant protocol for achieving agreement among distributed systems, widely used as a foundation for reliable, replicated state machines and modern distributed databases.
-
B.
Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance
Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance is a consensus algorithm for distributed systems that efficiently tolerates Byzantine (arbitrary) faults, enabling reliable operation even when some nodes behave maliciously or unpredictably.
-
C.
Raft consensus algorithm
chosen
Raft consensus algorithm is a distributed consensus protocol designed to be more understandable and easier to implement than Paxos while providing equivalent fault-tolerant guarantees.
-
D.
Byzantine fault tolerance
Byzantine fault tolerance is a property of distributed systems that enables them to continue operating correctly even when some components behave arbitrarily or maliciously.
-
E.
Paxos
Paxos is a small Greek island in the Ionian Sea, known for its clear turquoise waters, olive groves, and tranquil, less-touristed atmosphere.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd06a26481908039e2a1bae8c597 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5e394969c81909d09b2300ea0e041 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:04 p.m.