Triple
T19111680
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Raft consensus algorithm |
E467805
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fault-tolerant consensus protocol |
C41036
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: fault-tolerant consensus protocol Context triple: [Raft consensus algorithm, instanceOf, fault-tolerant consensus protocol]
-
A.
cluster-wide lock manager
A cluster-wide lock manager is a distributed coordination component that provides mutually exclusive access to shared resources across all nodes in a cluster, ensuring consistency and preventing conflicting operations.
-
B.
Algorand protocol feature
An Algorand protocol feature is a specific built-in capability or mechanism of the Algorand blockchain that enhances its security, scalability, consensus, or smart contract functionality.
-
C.
distributed system
A distributed system is a collection of independent computers that appear to users as a single coherent system by coordinating and communicating over a network to achieve common goals.
-
D.
end-to-end auditable voting scheme
An end-to-end auditable voting scheme is a voting system that allows each voter and independent observers to verify, from ballot casting through tallying, that all recorded votes are correctly included in the final result without revealing how any individual voted.
-
E.
blockchain-based protocol
A blockchain-based protocol is a decentralized set of rules and procedures encoded on a distributed ledger that governs how participants validate, record, and agree on transactions or data without relying on a central authority.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd06a26481908039e2a1bae8c597 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:04 p.m.