Triple
T19082987
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ravad |
E467074
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableForStance |
P109408
|
FINISHED |
| Object | critical engagement with Maimonides’ legal codification |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: critical engagement with Maimonides’ legal codification | Statement: [Ravad, notableForStance, critical engagement with Maimonides’ legal codification]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableForStance Context triple: [Ravad, notableForStance, critical engagement with Maimonides’ legal codification]
-
A.
notableStand
chosen
Indicates that an entity is particularly well-known or distinguished for a specific stance, position, or viewpoint.
-
B.
notableFor
Indicates that an entity is especially recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, characteristic, or role.
-
C.
notableState
Indicates that an entity is significantly associated with, recognized in, or prominently linked to a particular state (such as a U.S. state or similar regional jurisdiction).
-
D.
notableProponent
Indicates that an entity is a well-known advocate or supporter of another entity, idea, or practice.
-
E.
notableArgument
Indicates that an entity plays a particularly important, prominent, or distinguished role as an argument (participant) in a given relation or event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd04f4488190b1121cc53ef2bfd6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5e2eab58c8190a987c88d633c92ec |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4b9a604308190a3235184f9f2c056 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:16 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:04 p.m.