Triple

T19079181
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Council of Ministers E466980 entity
Predicate mustRetainConfidenceOf P9267 FINISHED
Object Assembly LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Assembly | Statement: [Council of Ministers, mustRetainConfidenceOf, Assembly]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mustRetainConfidenceOf
Context triple: [Council of Ministers, mustRetainConfidenceOf, Assembly]
  • A. requiresConfidenceOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity can only proceed, function, or be accepted if it has sufficient trust, assurance, or belief in the reliability or correctness of another entity.
  • B. mustRetain
    Indicates that an entity is required to keep or preserve another entity and is not allowed to discard, delete, or release it.
  • C. canRetain
    Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to keep, hold, or maintain possession or control of another entity over time.
  • D. canWithdrawConfidenceFrom
    Indicates that an entity has the authority or ability to revoke or remove its previously given confidence or support from another entity.
  • E. heldConfidenceVoteIn
    Indicates that a confidence vote was conducted within a specified governing body, assembly, or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dd04f4488190b1121cc53ef2bfd6 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5e2e82ec08190873186ff51e89d86 completed April 20, 2026, 8:25 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4b9a604308190a3235184f9f2c056 completed April 19, 2026, 11:16 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:04 p.m.