Triple
T19078055
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lot's wife |
E466953
|
entity |
| Predicate | commandedNotTo |
P17766
|
FINISHED |
| Object | look back |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: look back | Statement: [Lot's wife, commandedNotTo, look back]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commandedNotTo Context triple: [Lot's wife, commandedNotTo, look back]
-
A.
commandedTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity has issued an order or directive for another entity to perform a specific action or fulfill a particular duty.
-
B.
commandedFor
Indicates that one entity issued an order or directive on behalf of, or in service of, another entity or purpose.
-
C.
commandedIn
Indicates that one entity held a position of command or leadership within a specified context, such as a battle, operation, or organization.
-
D.
commandedBy
Indicates that one entity holds authoritative control or issues orders over another entity.
-
E.
commandedOperationAgainst
Indicates that one entity issued authoritative orders to initiate or conduct a specific military or strategic operation directed against another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd04f4488190b1121cc53ef2bfd6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5e2e61b60819092d42614f04a087c |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4b9a604308190a3235184f9f2c056 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:16 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:04 p.m.