Triple

T19075181
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SEGIB E466884 entity
Predicate supportsCooperationType P19448 FINISHED
Object political cooperation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: political cooperation | Statement: [SEGIB, supportsCooperationType, political cooperation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsCooperationType
Context triple: [SEGIB, supportsCooperationType, political cooperation]
  • A. supportsCooperative
    Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or endorsement to enable or strengthen another entity’s cooperative activities or partnerships.
  • B. cooperationType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or form of cooperative relationship that exists between the related entities.
  • C. supportsCollaborationFeature
    Indicates that one entity provides or enables a collaboration-related feature for another entity or within a system.
  • D. hasCooperative
    Indicates that one entity participates in a cooperative relationship or partnership with another entity.
  • E. definesCooperationWith
    Indicates that one entity formally specifies or establishes the terms, scope, or nature of cooperative interaction with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dd04f4488190b1121cc53ef2bfd6 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5e2e3c7b08190bf6448ead11ba916 completed April 20, 2026, 8:25 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4b99f602881909eeb9c780597e0e6 completed April 19, 2026, 11:16 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:04 p.m.