Triple
T19071495
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Book of John (Mandaean) |
E466800
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusWithinCanon |
P62601
|
FINISHED |
| Object | major Mandaean scripture |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: major Mandaean scripture | Statement: [Book of John (Mandaean), statusWithinCanon, major Mandaean scripture]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusWithinCanon Context triple: [Book of John (Mandaean), statusWithinCanon, major Mandaean scripture]
-
A.
hasPlaceInCanon
chosen
Indicates that something holds a specific status or position within an established canon or authoritative body of works.
-
B.
eraInCanon
Indicates that a subject belongs to, occurs within, or is classified as part of a specific era defined in a canon or fictional continuity.
-
C.
followsInCanon
Indicates that one entity occurs later than and in continuity with another within an established narrative or canonical sequence.
-
D.
notInCanonOf
Indicates that something is excluded from, or does not belong to, the officially recognized canon of a given work or universe.
-
E.
originDebatedInCanon
Indicates that the character’s or entity’s origin story is discussed with conflicting or unresolved explanations within the official canon.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd04f4488190b1121cc53ef2bfd6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5e19fa6948190bdf8e8ec022e12f2 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4b99f602881909eeb9c780597e0e6 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:16 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:04 p.m.