Triple
T19067497
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lower Willamette subbasin |
E466703
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasManagementInterest |
P134159
|
FINISHED |
| Object | flood control |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: flood control | Statement: [Lower Willamette subbasin, hasManagementInterest, flood control]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasManagementInterest Context triple: [Lower Willamette subbasin, hasManagementInterest, flood control]
-
A.
hasManagementRelevance
Indicates that something is pertinent or significant to management activities, decisions, or responsibilities.
-
B.
hasManagement
Indicates that one entity exercises managerial authority or oversight over another entity.
-
C.
hasManagementNeed
Indicates that an entity requires management, oversight, or intervention to address a particular condition, resource, or situation.
-
D.
hasManagementGoal
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific management objective or target it is intended to achieve or support.
-
E.
managesInterestsIn
Indicates that one entity is responsible for overseeing, handling, or administering the interests or stakes of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd04f4488190b1121cc53ef2bfd6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5e19918848190abb6dd060a9dbecb |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4b99f602881909eeb9c780597e0e6 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:16 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e4bfe8a06081909fd5c28a33e9f218 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:03 p.m.