Triple
T19065853
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | City of Forks |
E466656
|
entity |
| Predicate | county |
P75
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Clallam County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Clallam County | Statement: [City of Forks, county, Clallam County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Clallam County Context triple: [City of Forks, county, Clallam County]
-
A.
Clallam County, Washington
chosen
Clallam County, Washington is a coastal county on the Olympic Peninsula known for its rugged Pacific shoreline, proximity to Olympic National Park, and communities such as Port Angeles and Sequim.
-
B.
Forfar County
Forfar County is a historic Scottish county, also known as Angus, located on the east coast of Scotland.
-
C.
Pend Oreille County
Pend Oreille County is a rural county in the northeastern corner of Washington State, known for its forested mountains, lakes, and the Pend Oreille River along the Canadian border.
-
D.
Mason County
Mason County is a rural county in central Texas known for its ranching, hunting, and the historic town of Mason.
-
E.
Mason County
Mason County is a county in western Washington State known for its forests, waterways, and location along the southern reaches of Puget Sound.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd04f4488190b1121cc53ef2bfd6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5e198621481908618f65dd01746fc |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:03 p.m.