Triple
T19057383
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Animas River |
E466432
|
entity |
| Predicate | colorChangeDuringEvent |
P44865
|
FINISHED |
| Object | bright yellow-orange |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: bright yellow-orange | Statement: [Animas River, colorChangeDuringEvent, bright yellow-orange]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colorChangeDuringEvent Context triple: [Animas River, colorChangeDuringEvent, bright yellow-orange]
-
A.
lightingColorChangesForEvents
Indicates that the color of lighting is altered in response to specific events or event conditions.
-
B.
typicalColorChange
chosen
Indicates a characteristic or commonly observed change in color that an entity undergoes under normal or expected conditions.
-
C.
colorCharge
Indicates a relationship where an entity possesses a specific quantum color charge (such as red, green, or blue) in the context of strong nuclear interactions.
-
D.
laterColorBroadcast
Indicates that the referenced broadcast occurred at a later time than another broadcast and was transmitted in color.
-
E.
colorTincture
Indicates that one entity has a specific heraldic color or tincture applied to it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd040fb881909af2a964f65ad208 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5dc0742288190a594be859184841a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4b99633c8819097988608c278ecf8 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:16 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:03 p.m.