Triple
T19055829
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nawfal ibn Abd Manaf |
E466391
|
entity |
| Predicate | tribalAffiliation |
P13151
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Banu Nawfal |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Banu Nawfal | Statement: [Nawfal ibn Abd Manaf, tribalAffiliation, Banu Nawfal]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Banu Nawfal Context triple: [Nawfal ibn Abd Manaf, tribalAffiliation, Banu Nawfal]
-
A.
Banu Nawfal
chosen
Banu Nawfal was a prominent clan within the Quraysh tribe of Mecca, known for its role in pre-Islamic and early Islamic Arabian society.
-
B.
Banu Ali
Banu Ali is a lesser-known clan within the larger Banu Hashim lineage of the Quraysh tribe in early Islamic history.
-
C.
Banu Jaafar
Banu Jaafar was an earlier ruling clan or lineage in the Hejaz region that held power before being succeeded by the Banu Qatadah.
-
D.
Banu Hanifa
Banu Hanifa was a prominent Arab tribe of central Arabia, historically centered in the Al-Yamama region and influential in early Islamic-era politics and religious movements.
-
E.
Banu Taym
Banu Taym was a prominent clan of the Quraysh tribe in Mecca, historically notable as the clan of the first caliph, Abu Bakr.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd040fb881909af2a964f65ad208 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5dc056b708190a2b84cbddf0fc2d9 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:03 p.m.