Triple
T19018286
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mughal–Sikh conflicts |
E465414
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Battle of Lohgarh |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Battle of Lohgarh | Statement: [Mughal–Sikh conflicts, hasPart, Battle of Lohgarh]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Battle of Lohgarh Context triple: [Mughal–Sikh conflicts, hasPart, Battle of Lohgarh]
-
A.
Battle of Nirmohgarh
The Battle of Nirmohgarh was an early 18th-century clash in which Guru Gobind Singh’s Sikh forces fought against the Mughal-led coalition near Nirmohgarh in present-day Himachal Pradesh, India.
-
B.
Battle of Nadaun
The Battle of Nadaun was a late 17th-century conflict in the Himalayan foothills in which Guru Gobind Singh allied with local hill chiefs to defeat Mughal-aligned forces, reinforcing Sikh resistance to Mughal authority.
-
C.
Battle of Hargobindpur
The Battle of Hargobindpur was a 17th-century conflict in which the sixth Sikh Guru, Guru Hargobind, led Sikh forces against Mughal-aligned troops, marking a key moment in the militarization of the Sikh community.
-
D.
Battle of Ramnagar
The Battle of Ramnagar was an 1848 engagement during the Second Anglo-Sikh War in which British forces clashed with the Sikh army along the banks of the Chenab River in Punjab.
-
E.
Battle of Khatoli
The Battle of Khatoli was a 16th-century conflict in northern India in which the Rajput forces of Mewar under Rana Sanga clashed with the Lodi Sultanate, marking a key episode in Rana Sanga’s rise as a dominant regional power.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Battle of Lohgarh Target entity description: The Battle of Lohgarh was a significant early 18th-century clash in which Sikh forces, under Banda Singh Bahadur, defended the fortified stronghold of Lohgarh against the Mughal Empire during the Mughal–Sikh conflicts.
-
A.
Battle of Nirmohgarh
The Battle of Nirmohgarh was an early 18th-century clash in which Guru Gobind Singh’s Sikh forces fought against the Mughal-led coalition near Nirmohgarh in present-day Himachal Pradesh, India.
-
B.
Battle of Nadaun
The Battle of Nadaun was a late 17th-century conflict in the Himalayan foothills in which Guru Gobind Singh allied with local hill chiefs to defeat Mughal-aligned forces, reinforcing Sikh resistance to Mughal authority.
-
C.
Battle of Hargobindpur
The Battle of Hargobindpur was a 17th-century conflict in which the sixth Sikh Guru, Guru Hargobind, led Sikh forces against Mughal-aligned troops, marking a key moment in the militarization of the Sikh community.
-
D.
Battle of Ramnagar
The Battle of Ramnagar was an 1848 engagement during the Second Anglo-Sikh War in which British forces clashed with the Sikh army along the banks of the Chenab River in Punjab.
-
E.
Battle of Khatoli
The Battle of Khatoli was a 16th-century conflict in northern India in which the Rajput forces of Mewar under Rana Sanga clashed with the Lodi Sultanate, marking a key episode in Rana Sanga’s rise as a dominant regional power.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd025c188190a1d81f5b4ec7e2c6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5d6dd0e6c8190a6dc6af1f7901299 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:33 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:02 p.m.