Triple

T19013325
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jerome's biblical commentaries E465281 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Commentary on Galatians — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Commentary on Galatians | Statement: [Jerome's biblical commentaries, contains, Commentary on Galatians]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Commentary on Galatians
Context triple: [Jerome's biblical commentaries, contains, Commentary on Galatians]
  • A. Commentary on Romans
    Commentary on Romans is a theological work by Reformation scholar Philip Melanchthon offering a humanist and Lutheran interpretation of the Apostle Paul’s Epistle to the Romans.
  • B. Commentary on Romans
    Commentary on Romans is a 16th-century biblical exposition on Paul’s Epistle to the Romans by Spanish reformer Juan de Valdés, reflecting his humanist and evangelical theological views.
  • C. Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
    Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans is a classic 19th-century Reformed theological exposition of Paul’s letter to the Romans, widely used in conservative Protestant biblical scholarship.
  • D. Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
    Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans is a theological exposition of Paul’s Letter to the Romans by Lutheran reformer Johann Bugenhagen, reflecting early Protestant biblical interpretation.
  • E. Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
    Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans is a theological exegesis of the New Testament book of Romans by the Dutch Reformed theologian Franciscus Gomarus, reflecting his strict Calvinist and anti-Arminian views.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Commentary on Galatians
Target entity description: Commentary on Galatians is an early Christian exegetical work offering theological and doctrinal interpretation of the New Testament Epistle to the Galatians.
  • A. Commentary on Romans
    Commentary on Romans is a theological work by Reformation scholar Philip Melanchthon offering a humanist and Lutheran interpretation of the Apostle Paul’s Epistle to the Romans.
  • B. Commentary on Romans
    Commentary on Romans is a 16th-century biblical exposition on Paul’s Epistle to the Romans by Spanish reformer Juan de Valdés, reflecting his humanist and evangelical theological views.
  • C. Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
    Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans is a classic 19th-century Reformed theological exposition of Paul’s letter to the Romans, widely used in conservative Protestant biblical scholarship.
  • D. Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
    Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans is a theological exposition of Paul’s Letter to the Romans by Lutheran reformer Johann Bugenhagen, reflecting early Protestant biblical interpretation.
  • E. Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
    Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans is a theological exegesis of the New Testament book of Romans by the Dutch Reformed theologian Franciscus Gomarus, reflecting his strict Calvinist and anti-Arminian views.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dd025c188190a1d81f5b4ec7e2c6 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5d6aac4dc8190ac51f22c13f1b96c completed April 20, 2026, 7:32 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:02 p.m.