Triple

T19012727
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lensky – tenor E465267 entity
Predicate typicalSingerProfile P41733 FINISHED
Object light to full lyric tenor LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: light to full lyric tenor | Statement: [Lensky – tenor, typicalSingerProfile, light to full lyric tenor]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalSingerProfile
Context triple: [Lensky – tenor, typicalSingerProfile, light to full lyric tenor]
  • A. typicalProfile chosen
    Indicates that an entity represents the standard or most representative profile or pattern for another entity.
  • B. typicalPlayerProfile
    Indicates the usual or characteristic attributes, behaviors, or demographics associated with a representative player in a given context.
  • C. typicalPerformerRoleType
    Indicates the usual or characteristic role type that a performer commonly plays or is associated with in their performances.
  • D. typicalSpeaker
    Indicates that the subject is a prototypical or characteristic speaker or source of utterances in the context of the object.
  • E. featuresMusician
    Indicates that something (such as a work, event, or recording) prominently includes or showcases a particular musician.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dd025c188190a1d81f5b4ec7e2c6 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5d6a9bac8819093f9af57000667b0 completed April 20, 2026, 7:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4a2fd80c081908237317a3a883e1c completed April 19, 2026, 9:40 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:02 p.m.