Triple

T19005030
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Clyde Frazier E465056 entity
Predicate styleTrademark P134097 FINISHED
Object rhyming commentary LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rhyming commentary | Statement: [Clyde Frazier, styleTrademark, rhyming commentary]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: styleTrademark
Context triple: [Clyde Frazier, styleTrademark, rhyming commentary]
  • A. trademark
    Indicates that one entity legally owns and uses a distinctive sign, name, or symbol to identify and distinguish its goods or services from those of others.
  • B. visualTrademark
    Indicates that one entity serves as a visual trademark or logo representing another entity.
  • C. brandingStyle
    Indicates the specific visual and stylistic approach used to represent a brand’s identity.
  • D. hairStyleTrademark
    Indicates that a particular hairstyle is legally protected or recognized as a trademark associated with an entity.
  • E. brandingFeature
    Indicates that one entity serves as a branding-related characteristic, element, or attribute that helps define or distinguish another entity’s brand identity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dd01a56c81909694a128c66b21d7 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5d6a494688190a277b2cddf300235 completed April 20, 2026, 7:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4a2f88e0c81908cb20f08bf24cd32 completed April 19, 2026, 9:40 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e4ad8e075c8190ad561edc5e520057 completed April 19, 2026, 10:25 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:01 p.m.