Triple

T1900291
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Comitia Tributa E37675 entity
Predicate hadElectoralFunction P30981 FINISHED
Object election of magistrates LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: election of magistrates | Statement: [Comitia Tributa, hadElectoralFunction, election of magistrates]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadElectoralFunction
Context triple: [Comitia Tributa, hadElectoralFunction, election of magistrates]
  • A. hasElectoralAuthority chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses the official power or legal right to oversee, manage, or make binding decisions about electoral processes or outcomes.
  • B. hasElectorate
    Indicates that a political representative, office, or governing body is associated with and serves a specific group of voters or electoral district.
  • C. usesElectoralRight
    Indicates that an entity exercises its electoral rights, such as voting or otherwise participating in an electoral process.
  • D. usedInElection
    Indicates that something (such as a resource, tool, or method) was employed or applied as part of conducting an election.
  • E. hadVoteIn
    Indicates that an entity participated by casting a vote in a particular decision, election, or voting event.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8861be7148190a680937ec451a304 completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb18c46c88190b10c05bf5c6a2d9c completed March 7, 2026, 5:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abafe7e7e88190b58c0df59187c0c2 completed March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:35 p.m.