Triple

T18988709
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Earl of Avon E464622 entity
Predicate hasHeirMaleRequirement P15554 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Earl of Avon, hasHeirMaleRequirement, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHeirMaleRequirement
Context triple: [Earl of Avon, hasHeirMaleRequirement, yes]
  • A. hasHeirPresumptiveEligibility
    Indicates that an entity is recognized as having a current, but potentially displaceable, right to inherit or succeed to a position, title, or estate.
  • B. hasHeirApparentFunction
    Indicates that an entity has a designated heir apparent role or function assigned to it.
  • C. hasGenderRequirement chosen
    Indicates that a particular role, activity, or context specifies a required or restricted gender for participation or eligibility.
  • D. notUsedIfMonarchHasNoDaughters
    Indicates that this relationship or rule does not apply in cases where the monarch has no daughters.
  • E. requiresCelibacyFor
    Indicates that one entity imposes a requirement of celibacy on another entity as a condition for participation, membership, role, or status.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dd008af48190a97ff1c6488edf1b completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5d66272388190850a7e5dec165a01 completed April 20, 2026, 7:31 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4a2f88e0c81908cb20f08bf24cd32 completed April 19, 2026, 9:40 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:01 p.m.