Triple
T18970153
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jerome Frank |
E464144
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Law and the Modern Mind |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Law and the Modern Mind | Statement: [Jerome Frank, notableWork, Law and the Modern Mind]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Law and the Modern Mind Context triple: [Jerome Frank, notableWork, Law and the Modern Mind]
-
A.
The Concept of Law
The Concept of Law is a foundational work of legal philosophy that systematically analyzes the nature of law, legal systems, and the relationship between law, morality, and social rules.
-
B.
The Paradoxes of Legal Science
The Paradoxes of Legal Science is a 1928 jurisprudential treatise by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores the philosophical tensions and logical contradictions within legal reasoning and doctrine.
-
C.
The Essentials from the Science of Legal Theory
The Essentials from the Science of Legal Theory is an English rendering of al-Ghazali’s seminal work in Islamic legal theory, presenting the foundational principles and methods of deriving Islamic law.
-
D.
Law's Empire
Law's Empire is a seminal work of legal philosophy by Ronald Dworkin that articulates his theory of law as integrity, arguing that legal interpretation should present the law in its morally best light.
-
E.
Law as a Leap of Faith
Law as a Leap of Faith is a collection of essays by legal philosopher John Gardner that explores the nature of law, legal obligation, and their relationship to morality.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Law and the Modern Mind Target entity description: Law and the Modern Mind is a seminal 1930 work of American legal realism in which Jerome Frank challenges traditional notions of legal certainty and emphasizes the psychological and subjective elements in judicial decision-making.
-
A.
The Concept of Law
The Concept of Law is a foundational work of legal philosophy that systematically analyzes the nature of law, legal systems, and the relationship between law, morality, and social rules.
-
B.
The Paradoxes of Legal Science
The Paradoxes of Legal Science is a 1928 jurisprudential treatise by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores the philosophical tensions and logical contradictions within legal reasoning and doctrine.
-
C.
The Essentials from the Science of Legal Theory
The Essentials from the Science of Legal Theory is an English rendering of al-Ghazali’s seminal work in Islamic legal theory, presenting the foundational principles and methods of deriving Islamic law.
-
D.
Law's Empire
Law's Empire is a seminal work of legal philosophy by Ronald Dworkin that articulates his theory of law as integrity, arguing that legal interpretation should present the law in its morally best light.
-
E.
Law as a Leap of Faith
Law as a Leap of Faith is a collection of essays by legal philosopher John Gardner that explores the nature of law, legal obligation, and their relationship to morality.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dd008af48190a97ff1c6488edf1b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5d619acbc8190acb49b3fae707758 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, noon